Beginner

Segregated Accounts

Also known as: Client Fund Segregation, Client Money Segregation, Segregation of Client Funds, Segregated Client Accounts

What is Segregated Accounts?

A segregated account is a bank account in which a broker holds client deposits entirely separate from its own corporate operating funds. Client money is ring-fenced, so it cannot legally be used to cover the broker's payroll, rent, marketing, or debts, and it is protected if the broker fails.

The practice exists because a retail trader's balance is not a loan to the broker; it is the client's own money held on trust. Regulators codify this. Under the UK Financial Conduct Authority's CASS 7 rules, a firm must keep client money in a designated client bank account at an approved credit institution and reconcile it daily. CySEC, ASIC, and ESMA-aligned regimes impose equivalent duties across the EU, Cyprus, and Australia.

Key takeaways
  • Client money sits in a separate bank account and cannot fund broker operations or debts.
  • Tier-1 regulators (FCA CASS 7, CySEC, ASIC) mandate daily reconciliation and audit.
  • Segregation reduces counterparty risk but does not remove market risk or fraud.
  • Compensation schemes (FSCS GBP 85k, ICF EUR 20k) sit on top of segregation.
  • Name the actual custodian banks in marketing; big banking names convert.

In practice a broker regulated in a tier-1 jurisdiction will deposit client funds with banks such as Barclays, Lloyds, or National Australia Bank, run an internal client-money reconciliation every business day, and commission periodic CASS audits. If the broker becomes insolvent, an administrator returns the segregated pool to clients ahead of the broker's general creditors, and a compensation scheme such as the UK's FSCS (up to GBP 85,000) or the Cyprus ICF (up to EUR 20,000) may top up any shortfall.

Segregation is not the same as insurance, and it is not the same as a guarantee. It reduces counterparty risk; it does not remove market risk, operational fraud, or the shortfall that can occur if reconciliations were falsified. That distinction is exactly what a compliant partner must communicate.

How it works

When a trader deposits, the money is routed into the broker's client bank account rather than its house account. The broker's ledger tracks each client's individual entitlement, but the cash itself sits commingled in the pooled client account, legally owned by the clients collectively.

Each business day the broker performs an internal client-money reconciliation: it compares the total it owes clients against the balance actually held in segregated bank accounts and any margin posted at liquidity providers. Any shortfall must be topped up from house funds by the next day. External auditors periodically test these reconciliations and issue a CASS (or equivalent) assurance report to the regulator.

Because the money is held on trust, it falls outside the broker's estate in an insolvency. An administrator distributes the client-money pool back to clients on a pro-rata basis before ordinary creditors are paid.

  1. Client deposits funds

    The trader funds their account; the broker routes the cash into a designated client bank account at an approved credit institution, not the corporate account.

  2. Daily reconciliation

    The broker compares total client entitlements against segregated bank balances plus margin at liquidity providers, topping up any shortfall from house funds.

  3. Independent audit

    External auditors periodically test the reconciliations and issue a CASS-style assurance report to the regulator.

  4. Insolvency protection

    If the broker fails, an administrator returns the client-money pool to clients ahead of general creditors, with a compensation scheme covering shortfalls up to a cap.

Why it matters for partnership: Segregation is a top-of-funnel trust signal: naming the tier-1 banks and the regulator's client-money rule lowers a cautious lead's first-deposit anxiety and lifts FTD conversion. It also de-risks your own book, because clients on a properly segregated broker are far less likely to churn over withdrawal fears.

Real World Example

IC Markets states it holds retail client funds in segregated trust accounts with tier-1 banks including National Australia Bank and Commonwealth Bank, separate from company money. An affiliate promoting IC Markets can cite that arrangement plus its ASIC (AFSL 335692) client-money obligations on a landing page, giving a wary first-time depositor a concrete, verifiable reason to fund an account.

Segregation vs. investor compensation scheme
Feature Segregated accounts Compensation scheme (FSCS/ICF)
Purpose Keep client money separate from broker funds Reimburse clients if segregated funds fall short
When it applies Continuously, day to day Only after broker default
Coverage Full client entitlement in principle Capped (GBP 85k FSCS / EUR 20k ICF)
Provided by The broker under regulator rules Statutory industry-funded scheme

Pro Tip

Name the tier-1 custodian banks and cite the exact client-money rule (e.g. FCA CASS 7) rather than saying "funds are safe" — specificity converts and stays compliant.

Common Pitfalls

Treating segregation as a fraud-proof guarantee: an unregulated offshore broker can claim segregated accounts while quietly commingling funds, so verify the regulator and audit trail before promoting the claim.

FAQ

Why do traders care about segregated accounts?

It gives them confidence their deposit is held on trust and used only for their own trading, so a broker's financial trouble should not consume their balance.

Does segregation guarantee I get 100% of my money back if a broker fails?

No. It ring-fences the funds, but a shortfall from mismanagement or fraud is possible; that is where a compensation scheme like FSCS or ICF may cover part of the gap up to a cap.

How can I verify a broker really segregates client money?

Check the broker's regulator (FCA, CySEC, ASIC), read the client agreement for the named custodian bank, and confirm the licence on the regulator's public register.

Is segregated money the same as insured money?

No. Segregation separates the funds; a compensation scheme is the insurance-like layer that reimburses eligible clients after a default, only up to its statutory limit.

Do offshore brokers offer segregated accounts?

Some claim to, but light-touch offshore regimes rarely enforce daily reconciliation or CASS-style audits, so the claim carries far less assurance than a tier-1 licence.

Can an IB be liable if a promoted broker misuses client funds?

You are not the custodian, but promoting a broker whose claims you did not verify is a reputational and, in some regimes, regulatory risk, so due diligence protects you too.

Related Insights

View all Insights